Stuart Weitzman Over The Knee 50/50 (Black) vs. Vince Camuto 'Karita' Over the Knee Boot (Black)
Stuart Weitzman 5050 黑色的過膝蓋靴子 vs. Vince Camuto 'Karita' 黑色的過膝蓋靴子, 兩款相似度多少呢?
Are Vince Camuto Karita boots a less expensive version of Stuart Weitzman's 50/50 boots???
你們認為Vince Camuto Karita 是不是 Stuart Weitzman's 5050靴子的便宜代替品呢?我很喜歡 Stuart Weitzman 5050 靴子,但是它稅前要598美金。。。因此我在努力尋找和它類似,同樣舒服,穿起來同樣顯腿長的靴子。終於,讓我找到Vince Camuto Karita 靴子!它是市面上我覺得和5050靴子最類似的了。
I'm wearing a Vince Camuto boot on one leg and a 50/50 on the other leg. Can you tell which one is which??? I will tell you the answer and their differences at the end.
我現在一腳穿著Vince Camuto 靴子,一腳穿著 Stuart Weitzman's 5050靴子,你們能不能猜出那隻腳穿的是哪款靴子呢???你們先猜,一會我告訴你們答案哈~


Can you tell?
猜得出來嗎?哈哈~


Can you tell? Haha, pretty hard, right? Ok, the answer is that the left one (on my right leg) is the Vince Camuto boot (the shorter one) and the right one (on my left leg) is the 50/50 (the taller one). They look so similar!!! I usually wear size 6 and ordered size 6 for both of them, and they fit perfectly!
猜出來了嗎?很難猜是不是哈?看起來兩隻靴子很像吧? 好吧,告訴你們答案。左邊(也就是我右腳)穿的是Vince Camuto靴子(也就是圖上看起來比較短的那雙),右邊(也就是我的左腿上的靴子,長點的那雙)是Stuart Weitzman 5050 靴子。 猜對了嗎? 它們看起來很像,是吧? 對於它們的號碼,一般就是你穿什麼號就買什麼號,對我來說,大小正合適(我穿的是美國SIZE6號,買的也是6號,非常合腳)。
好吧,接下來說說我覺得它們的不同之處吧。
Differences:
- The calves with the 50/50 are more skinny than the other boots since the 50/50 are more tight on the top, and cover calves pretty well. (50/50: about 13" flexible circumference; Vince Camuto boots: about 14" circumference)
- Both of them are over the knee, with the 50/50 being just a little bit taller. (50/50: 20.5" tall shaft; Vince Camuto boots: 21-1/2" height shaft)
- Heel difference: 50/50: 1.75" heel; Vince Camuto: 1" stacked heel
- The leather 50/50 is a little bit shinier and darker than the VC boots. The 50/50 leather is also smoother and softer. (Still pretty hard to tell this small difference)
- There is a button on the top of each VC boot; 50/50 does not have any buttons
不同之處:
- 緊實度:Stuart Weitzman 5050 靴子比較緊,將小腿包的更緊些,因此看起來小腿會更細小。當然,也更不容易脫下來。每次脫 Stuart Weitzman 5050 靴子都要非常辛苦。包得是在太緊了。不過也是因為這樣,小腿才會顯示的特別細哈。(Stuart Weitzman 50/50是寫說13英寸的周長,Vince Camuto靴子是大概14英寸周長。因此也就是周長一英寸的差別。差別真不大。)
- 長度:這兩款靴子都是過膝蓋。但是Stuart Weitzman 5050靴子稍微長些。大家可以看圖,圖上稍微長些的就是Stuart Weitzman 5050靴子。
- 鞋跟:Stuart Weitzman 5050的跟稍微高些。Stuart Weitzman 5050的跟是1.75英寸,而Vince Camuto靴子的跟是 1英寸。
- 皮質:Stuart Weitzman 5050看起來顏色稍微更深黑些,皮質也更亮點。而且5050靴子的皮質比較軟,摸起來也更舒服,更光滑些。但其實除非你看得非常非常仔細,特意認真拿它們做比較,否者很難看出這些細微的差別的。
- 有無裝飾品:Vince Camuto的靴子上有個類似鈕扣的裝飾,5050靴子上 沒有任何裝飾品。
Summary:
If you are looking for the Stuart Weitzmann 50/50 boots and want to pay $598 before tax , then go for it. 50/50 does a great job and makes your legs more narrow than any other boots. However, if you want a great deal (priced at about $150), but want to maintain the same quality, Vince Camuto is the best option! These boots are beautiful, soft, comfortable and classic! Basically, Vince Camuto Karita boots are just a less expensive version of Stuart Weitzman's 50/50 boots!
總結:
如果你非常非常喜歡Stuart Weitzmann 5050 靴子,又覺得這個價位對你來說,小菜一碟(稅前598美金,而且很難會有折扣),當然,我覺得Stuart Weitzmann 5050 靴子肯定更略勝一籌。它的確把你的小腿包的很細,是細腿的神器。
但是,如果你很喜歡它,又覺得它實在太貴。怎麼辦呢? 哈哈,那你可以考慮Vince Camuto Karita 靴子。它的皮質也非常好, 很軟,穿起來也舒服。也可以讓你小腿看起來非常細。可以說,是現在市面上,無論是皮質,樣子,還是穿起來的感覺,我覺得它是最接近Stuart Weitzmann 5050 靴子的。重點,它的原價只有稅前150美金。大概是5050靴子的三分之一,卻有著和它機其相似的皮質和外形!目前,它就是Stuart Weitzmann 5050 靴子最好的替代品了!
看的出來那雙是那款靴子嗎?還是很難辨認吧?我一般就是辨認鈕扣。。 右邊靴子上有個鈕扣的就是Vince Camuto Karita 靴子, 左邊沒鈕扣的是Stuart Weitzmann 5050 靴子。
要看更多,請點擊這裏: http://www.mylovelyfashionista.com/2014/07/stuart-weitzman-5050-vs-vince-camuto.html